The Big Leadership Development Myth

Over the last couple of decades, the training industry, hand in hand with corporate HR has developed the following myth: if managers go offsite for a training session once or a couple of times a year, they listen to some smart stuff or play a few games yielding “aha” experiences, gain insights about themselves and others, they go back to work, take a U-turn and change from autocratic assholes to ideal people managers.

Most recently, this myth has developed even further: instead of training events, brief infotainment sessions are offered to busy managers, providing opportunities for “inspiration”. Managers at international or large local companies went through traditional leadership trainings a long time ago (not that they would typically do what they should be doing as people managers), so HR needed to come up with something interesting from the new fads of leadership. How successful have these efforts been? Well, you can figure that out from the disenchanting results of workplace engagement surveys.

Learning, especially about behaviour, does not take place in training events but in everyday work situations. Adults learn from experience: they try out whatever they consider reasonable, they gain some experience, and keep on doing what works for them. No matter how great the inspiration or “aha” experience is, if it is not followed by lots of exploration, practice and reflection, it is unlikely to result in behavioural change.

It is quite scary that the above knowledge about adult learning and the importance of practice have been largely ignored by leadership development and HR professionals responsible for designing such programs. Interpersonal communication, delivering results, improving performance or developing people are not simple and mechanistic tasks, with several variables and situational factors. Even relatively simple and predictable activities, such as bouncing balls or sounding some tunes on a musical instrument require lots of practice, for a long period of time. Why would it be different, if we want to develop our listening skills, set better quality goals or provide supportive feedback instead of demotivating nagging? If we have practiced these for 50 or 100 times in a given year, then we can say that it has started to become part of our skillset. Do we really think that going through a couple of role-play exercises will result in real skills development? Are we serious, when we hope that an inspirational talk will be sufficient for an exhausted, half burned-out manager to change her belief system and long established time management habits?

If we really want to help managers in their development and are willing to invest money in the process, first of all, we should only concentrate on those who have the motivation to learn. Learning tools and training events can provide the initial step, but they are far from enough. Participants have to be supported in turning that knowledge into action, trying out what they have learned, and reflecting on the experience. Skills development will only be the result of long-term, regular practice.

I know that unfortunately it is much easier for HR people or corporate leaders to buy trainings and believe in miracles, and for the providers to sell what is asked from them, deliver and send an invoice.

Act2Manage Application

An interactive, gamification-based, practice-oriented leadership development application that provides immediate help and enables follow-up to the most common dilemmas.

Get info and request a free trial!

More blog posts:

wise owl

Harcolj úgy, mintha igazad lenne, hallgass úgy, mintha tévednél

Több kutatás jutott arra a következtetésre, hogy a pszichológiai biztonság érzete fontos összetevő egy ütőképes csapat életében. Kb. úgy lehetne leírni, hogy a vezető olyan környezetet teremt, melyben a csapattagok magabiztosan vállalhatják fel a véleményüket vagy végezhetik a munkát; anélkül, hogy tartaniuk kellene attól, hogy valaki ellenük fordítja, ha tévednek vagy büntetést kapnak, ha tévednek. A pszichológiai biztonság érzete lehetővé teszi, hogy bátran és nyíltan megkérdőjelezzük a hiedelmeket, véleményeket vagy épp azokat a módszereket, ahogyan a dolgokat csináljuk.
Ha fontosak számunkra ezek a dolgok, akkor érdemes megtanulni ügyesen egyensúlyozni a magabiztosság és a kétkedés között. Tapasztalatom szerint, egy egészséges mennyiségű kételkedés magunkban megóvhat bennünket attól, hogy arrogáns seggfejek legyünk. Vagy ahogyan egy ősi japán közmondás tartja: kevésbé vagyunk idegesítők, ha befogjuk a pofánkat. 🙂

Read more »
vízilabda

Ha még a világ legjobbjai is feszt botladoznak, mi másra számítanánk mi?

Életünk során mélyen bevésődnek a fejünkbe azok a történetek, melyek során a szegénylegény nekivág az útnak, kiállja a három próbát, aztán elnyeri méltó jutalmát. Azt várjuk tehát, hogy a sikerek lineárisak: nyomjuk, nyomjuk, aztán egyszer csak beköszönt, már akinek összejön. A többiek meg kénytelenek beérni a kudarccal. A valóság azonban ennél lényegesen összetettebb, sokkal kiszámíthatatlanabb hullámvasút. Mégis tartja magát a meggyőződés, hogy elindulsz egy úton, aztán hamar kiderül, hogy vagy a sikeresek vagy a lúzerek táborát szaporítod.

Read more »
diversity

Why do we struggle to introduce diversity at the workplace?

Researches and discussions report how diversity increases profit, productivity, or innovation. DEI (or more fashionably DEI&B) has clearly been on the HR agenda for many years now. We don’t need to do a deep analysis to experience how challenging it is to push the DEI idea through the managers. If we still feel it necessary to attend conferences, events or to go to workshops or training dinasours, it seems suspicious that it requires quite a lot of effort. But why is this, if the concept is so common sense? What is it that managers don’t understand? Honestly, they don’t understand what HR doesn’t do either.

Read more »