Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

A single e-mail is good for nothing

I frequently experience that a manager is awfully surprised when his people fail to deliver what he expects from them in the way he prefers, no matter if they belong to his own team, they are peer managers, project team members or colleagues from other departments.
Things do not materialize, despite the fact that the manager had clearly explained in an email message whatever he wanted. Recently a middle manager told me that his colleagues across the organization don’t pay sufficient attention to one of his projects. As he is not the direct boss of any of them, he feels that he has no power to influence their attitude or behaviour. I asked how he had communicated with them so far. It turned out that he had sent out a long explanatory email and informed their line managers of his project. Well, I told him, this is not too much. On one hand, people get tons of emails a day, on the other hand, they tend to skip the long ones. Line managers may or may not share the information they had been provided. Some regard your project as a priority, some don’t. He didn’t need any more questions from my side to conclude: “Should I talk to the directly?” “Well, that would probably help” – I replied. When we need someone to cooperate on an important task that requires significant effort, it is worth investing more energy into communication than just sending a single email. The best option is talking to them in person, but if it is not feasible, a phone or Skype call will do. It is far more likely to get things done if our partners understand the “why”: the background and importance of the task at hand. Verbal communication makes it possible to ask questions and clarification, sharing dilemmas and issues. It is very useful to understand these at the outset, instead of trying to figure out why things never got done after the missed deadline. In case of longer projects, it makes a lot of sense to do follow-up communication to see how things are proceeding and if any assistance is necessary from your side. You will experience that investing more attention and action into communication with your partners always pays off.

Act2Manage Application

An interactive, gamification-based, practice-oriented leadership development application that provides immediate help and enables follow-up to the most common dilemmas.

Get info and request a free trial!

More blog posts:

Miért terelik vissza a cégek a munkatársakat az irodába? 

Bár sokan még akár hetente kétszer-háromszor is otthonról dolgozhatnak, egyre több cég kötelezi el magát a teljes munkaidős irodai visszatérés mellett. Egy racionális világban egy ilyen elhatározás észszerűségen alapulna, tényekkel és adatokkal lenne alátámasztva, nem pusztán kényre-kedvre összeválogatott tanulmányokra hivatkozna. Látjuk azonban, hogy – más esetekhez hasonlóan, pl. tehetségmenedzsment, vezetők fejlesztése – a döntések nemhogy nem mindig észszerűségen alapulnak, de még csak az adatok és kutatások se zavarják meg a “tisztánlátást”.

Read more »

Hogyan építhetsz szokásokat, mondjuk az életminőséged javítására?

A vezetőkkel folytatott mentori munka során nagyban építünk a viselkedéstudósok pl. BJ Fogg munkásságára, aki a Stanford Egyetem viselkedéstervezési intézetének alapítója (Stanford Behavior Design Lab). Tudománya több multimilliárdos biznisz sikerének a kulcsa, de mi is profitálhatunk belőle a saját privát életünkben. Alább elmesélek egy valós történetet, melynek hőse épp a viselkedéstudósok által is igazolt tényezők segítségével könnyítette meg saját dolgát életmódváltása kapcsán.

Read more »