Five situations when you shouldn’t coach your colleagues

It is very enlightening to see that more and more companies invest time and money in teaching their managers coaching skills. The days of command and control management are fortunately over. If companies want to survive and prosper, they need to engage the heart and the soul of their employees, not just lease their hands, and the closest person to have a strong impact on those areas is their line manager.

In a 2018 BCG global study, among the Top 5 work preferences were “good relationship with superior”“learning opportunities”, and “career development”, all of which are closely associated with their direct boss acting as coach or mentor.

When managers are practicing a coaching approach at work, some of them tend to overuse it with good purpose, and opt for coaching when they should definitely be doing something else. If that happens too often, their people can get very frustrated and lose trust in coaching altogether. Here are five situations when coaching is not the answer:

When you want to give someone feedback

If you don’t like something you see or experience from a member of your team, you shouldn’t be coaching that out of them with questions. It is your responsibility to articulate your supportive feedback by describing the problem, giving specific examples, and focusing on the issue, not the person. Coaching, however, can be taken out of your toolbox when the solution is designed and action steps are agreed later in the discussion.

When they need input from your experience and/or knowledge

Coaching comes handy when a manager is approached by his or her team members with a problem. In order for your colleagues to develop, it’s ideal that they do the thinking themselves and find their own answers with you helping by listening attentively and guiding the conversation with good questions. However, if the individual doesn’t have the necessary knowledge or experience, this approach will not yield a satisfactory result. In this case, it is much more appropriate for the manager to share relevant experience from the past and/or teach specific bits of knowledge needed to solve the problem.

If you are the one who has to make the decision

There are few things more frustrating for an employee than answering theoretical questions about a situation where he or she does not have decision making authority. It is fully okay for the manager to ask clarifying questions to get a good understanding of the issue at hand, but then it is his turn to make up his mind and give direction for further action.

If your involvement is necessary to escalate something or settle an issue with a peer manager

When listening to your colleague’s problem, it might become evident that your direct involvement will be unavoidable. Certain issues require the weight of your role or stronger presence to sort it out in the management team, and sometimes it may even be necessary to ask support from your superior. In any of these cases, you should turn up your sleeves and initiate action yourself.

When prompt answer/action is critical at the moment

The fifth situation when coaching is not the preferred solution is when there is urgency involved. Even though in a normal situation learning should take precedence, if there is a need to act quickly, it is wiser to make your recommendation on what to do. I deliberately chose the word “recommendation”, as it is very rarely needed to order people around. Yes, if it is really life-threatening emergency. Note: managers facing a lot of stress tend to feel rushed all the time, so make sure you don’t judge all situations urgent, where there is no time for coaching!

While coaching is a great tool that enhances learning, motivation, cooperation and interpersonal relationships, it is critical that you learn, ideally from your own experience, when to use it and when to take a different approach.

Act2Manage Application

An interactive, gamification-based, practice-oriented leadership development application that provides immediate help and enables follow-up to the most common dilemmas.

Get info and request a free trial!

More blog posts:

Kritizálás helyett inkább gondolkodj kritikusan

Ugyanis annak több értelme van. A kritizálás leggyakrabban arról szól, hogy valaki más tevékenységének eredményében találunk kifogásolni valót, elsősorban a saját nézőpontunkból, saját tapasztalataink, meggyőződéseink, hiedelemrendszerünk, tudásunk és látókörünk alapján. A kritizálás tehát mindezeknek köszönhetően egyrészt meglehetősen gyenge alapokon áll, másrészt igen ritkán tartalmaz jól megvalósítható, kontextusba illő alternatív megoldási javaslatot. A klasszikus mondást idézve: fikázni könnyű, alkotni nehéz.

Read more »

Az önbizalom szerepéről, megerősítésének lehetőségeiről Nr2.

Legutóbbi írásomban bemutattam 6 „életmentő technikát”, amelyekkel nehéz helyzetekben helyrállíthatjuk önbizalmunkat és ötleteket generálhatunk, hogy sikeresen kilábaljunk egy szorított helyzetből. Mai írásomban bemutatok 6 hosszútávú gyakorlatot a stabil önbizalom/önbecsülés kiépítése érdekében. Az önbizalomkutatás egyik meghatározó személyisége Nathaniel Branden (kanadai-amerikai pszichoterapeuta), „Az önbecsülés hat pillére“ című könyvében tágabb kontextusban is bemutatja az önbecsülés és az önbizalom meglétének, kialakításának kérdéseit, alább ennek kivonatát ismertetem.

Read more »

A jövőállóság kulcsa: a hozzáadottérték-termelő képesség

Természetes, hogy a vállalatok, vállalkozások mérettől függetlenül folyamatosan keresik a hosszú távú fenntarthatóság és növekedés kulcsát, mivel az üzleti életben nem túl reális opció a stagnálásra gyúrni. Sokan azonban a gyakorlatban csak az orruk hegyéig látnak el a mindennapi küzdelem és darálás során, ami csak a közelebbi jövőre biztosítja a túlélést. Bár vannak, akik azt is felismerik, hogy előre kellene gondolkodni, turbulens világunkban azonban baromira nehéz évekre tervezni, három-öt éves stratégiákat gyártani, mert a fene tudja, mi minden történik még addig.

Read more »