3 Ways to Defend Your Calendar

In my experience, 80% of effective time management depends on strategic clarity and rigorous implementation, while only the remaining 20% can be improved by tools and techniques that make you more efficient. The clearer you are about what really matters to you both long term and for the upcoming 6-12 months, the easier it is to stick to them when you make your daily decisions on what you let into your calendar.

Let’s review three actions you can take to ensure that your actual use of time reflects your true priorities.

1. Enlist your most important goals in your key roles for the next 6 months

We have several roles both at work and in our private life. We are specialists, functional managers, people managers, team members, and leaders or sponsors of projects. We hold various family and community roles, and we should never forget that refuelling ourselves physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually is also a critical role that enables us to fulfil all the other roles sustainably. When you want to defend you calendar, it helps a lot if you have a list of your most important mid-term goals in each of your roles and that you remind yourself of them on a weekly basis, as put forward by Steven Covey. Anything else should only be added to your schedule if there is a very strong reason for it. Otherwise most of your time should be devoted to activities closely related to your highest priority goals.

2. Determine what will be a definite “yes” and a definite “no” for you

When my clients struggle and juggle with their numerous tasks and activities, I often ask them to first define what they want to say “yes” to. These are often linked to certain people, projects, responsibilities or goals that are the most important for them. Then I ask the client to enlist what they will definitely say “no” to. It immediately becomes evident, how many things they actually do what they don’t value highly. Finally, we discuss grey areas and identify cues that help the client tilt his or her decision in either direction. By making these clear, it will be much easier to refuse anything that doesn’t fall into the “yes” category.

3. Qualify each meeting request

People, especially in large organisations, tend to call a meeting no matter if it is necessary or not, inviting whoever they think should be there. Therefore, everybody ends up in meetings from dusk till dawn, not leaving time to actually do what they really want to. If you wish to defend your calendar, you simply can’t afford to accept meeting requests that you are not sure to create value, or where you feel that there would be a more efficient way from your side to contribute. Asking a few questions regarding the goal of the meeting and/or what is expected from you helps to decide how you can best add your part.

I am not saying that you can spend one hundred percent of your time with the priorities you define. Also, sometimes those priorities include assisting others with their goals. The point is to increase the proportion of time that you control and utilise to serve whatever is important for you. And that only happens when you effectively defend your calendar.

Act2Manage Application

An interactive, gamification-based, practice-oriented leadership development application that provides immediate help and enables follow-up to the most common dilemmas.

Get info and request a free trial!

More blog posts:

Two reasons why goal setting often fails

Over the past twenty years I have had a chance to see hundreds of performance appraisal documents that had a goal setting section. An incredibly high proportion contained low quality, vague goals, such as “keep up with the good work” or “develop communication skills”. All these managers missed an opportunity to actually carry out their primary responsibilities: improve the work performance and output of their people, and help them grow.

Read more »

Six Rules of Giving Truly Supportive Feedback

Having worked with hundreds of managers intending to develop their leadership skills, I heard most of them admit that they should be devoting much more effort to providing feedback for their colleagues. They know at least two strong reasons for that.

Read more »